Chú thích Phật_giáo_sơ_kỳ

  1. Schmithausen (1987) “Part I: Earliest Buddhism,” Panels of the VIIth World Sanskrit Conference Vol. II: Earliest Buddhism and Madhyamaka, ed. David Seyfort Ruegg and Lambert Schmithausen, Leiden: Kern Institute, pp. 1–4.
  2. Griffiths, Paul J. (1983) “Buddhist Jhana: A Form-Critical Study”, Religion 13, pp. 55–68.
  3. Collins, Steven (1990) “On the Very Idea of the Pali Canon”, Journal of the Pali Text Society 15, pp. 89–126.
  4. Lamotte, Étienne (1988) History of Indian Buddhism: From the Origins to the Śaka Era, translated from the French by Sara Boin-Webb, Louvain: Peeters Press
  5. Hirakawa, Akira (1990), A History of Indian Buddhism: From Sakyamuni to Early Mahāyāna, tr. Paul Groner, University of Hawaii Press
  6. Harvey,Introduction to Buddhism, Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 74
  7. 1 2 Hurvitz 1976.
  8. Nakamura 1989.
  9. Hirakawa 1990.
  10. Gombrich 1997, tr. 11–12.
  11. 1 2 Jong 1993, tr. 25.
  12. Warder 2000.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFWarder2000 (trợ giúp)
  13. Warder 1999.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFWarder1999 (trợ giúp)
  14. Disputed Dharmas: Early Buddhist Theories on Existence. by Collett Cox. The Institute for Buddhist Studies. Tokyo: 1995. ISBN 4-906267-36-X p. 23
  15. MacMillan Encyclopedia of Buddhism, 2004, p. 501
  16. 1 2 "Abhidhamma Pitaka." Encyclopædia Britannica. Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008.
  17. Buddhist Sects in India, Nalinaksha Dutt, 1978, p. 58
  18. "Buddhism." Encyclopædia Britannica. Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008.
  19. 1 2 Kanai Lal Hazra, Pali Language and Literature – A Systematic Survey and Historical Survey, 1994, Vol. 1, p. 415
  20. 1 2 Kanai Lal Hazra, Pali Language and Literature – A Systematic Survey and Historical Survey, 1994, Vol. 1, p. 412
  21. I.B. Horner, Book of the Discipline, Volume 5, p. 398
  22. MacMillan Encyclopedia of Buddhism, 2004, p. 1.
  23. A textual and Historical Analysis of the Khuddaka Nikaya – Oliver Abeynayake Ph.D., Colombo, First Edition – 1984, p. 113.
  24. This work (the Parivara) is in fact a very much later composition, and probably the work of a Ceylonese Thera. from: Book of the Discipline, vol. VI, p. ix (translators' introduction)
  25. would throw the earliest phase of this literature (the Mahayana Sutras) back to about the beginning of the common era., Macmillan Encyclopedia of Buddhism, 2004, p. 493